The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte SEIICHI TANAKA
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0864
Application No. 08/757,550
____________
HEARD: May 24, 2001
____________
Before FLEMING, LALL, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the rejection of claims 1, 3-6, and 12-35. We reverse.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal is a head mounted
display (HMD). A conventional HMD comprises a pair of
enlarging lenses, a pair of field diaphragms, a pair of
miniaturized liquid crystal displays (LCDs), and a pair of
back lights. All these components are mounted in a casing.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007