Appeal No. 1999-1170 Page 8
Application No. 08/801,872
the subject matter of claim 11. The rejection of independent claim 11 and dependent
claims 12-15 and 18-20 is not sustained.
The addition of Schaefer in the rejection of dependent claims 4, 5, 16 and 17 fails
to overcome the deficiencies discussed above with regard to the other rejections. The
rejection of these claims also cannot be sustained.
SUMMARY
Neither of the rejections is sustained.
The decision of the examiner is REVERSED.
NEAL E. ABRAMS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JOHN F. GONZALES )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007