Ex parte YAMAZAKI et al. - Page 3




              Appeal No. 1999-1466                                                                                        
              Application No. 08/371,486                                                                                  

              Matsumura et al. (Matsumura), a-Si FET IC integrated on a glass substrate (partial                          
              translation), National Convention Record, The Institute of Electronics and Communication                    
              Engineers of Japan, p. 2-287 (Mar. 1980).                                                                   
                     Claims 101-135 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                       
              Matsumura, Weitzel, Ovshinsky, LeComber, and Madan.                                                         
                     We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 63) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                      
              No. 66) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 65) and the                  
              Reply Brief (Paper No. 67) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which stand                  
              rejected.                                                                                                   


                                                       OPINION                                                            
                     According to the Answer, pages 3 and 4, Matsumura “shows the basic thin film                         
              transistor structure” that is claimed.  However, the examiner relies upon additional                        
              references to show obviousness of the claimed subject matter as a whole.  Matsumura is                      
              recognized as disclosing an SiO  film as a gate insulator.  The rejection turns to LeComber                 
                                                2                                                                         
              (Figure 1) and Madan (Figure 1(b)) for suggestion of substituting a silicon nitride gate film               
              for the silicon dioxide film disclosed by Matsumura.                                                        
                     Appellants contend that there is no suggestion in LeComber for the substitution that                 
              is contemplated by the rejection.  Appellants add, on pages 8 and 12-13 of the Brief, that                  
              the LeComber device utilizes a Schottky junction, “that is, a semiconductor-oxide-metal                     



                                                           -3-                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007