The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was
not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the
Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAMON DELORENZIS, RICHARD MEYER and DANIEL LAMKIN
____________
Appeal No. 1999-1757
Application No. 08/895,637
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STONER, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, FRANKFORT
and LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judges.
LAZARUS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final
rejection of claims 1, 3 through 5 and 7 through 17. Claims
24 through 27 were withdrawn from consideration as being for a
non-elected invention (see Paper No. 10, mailed May 1, 1996).
Claims 2, 6 and 18 through 23 have been canceled.1
1 Claims 2, 6 and 18-23 were canceled pursuant to the amendment filed February
2, 1996 (Paper No. 7).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007