Court Opinions

State Laws

US Code

US Constitution

Ex parte YAMAMOTO et al. - Page 1

Legal Research Home > Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2001 > Ex parte YAMAMOTO et al. - Page 1

                    The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                                      
                              for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                            
                                                                                                    Paper No. 31                    
                                   UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                        
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                         
                                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                                             
                                                          ____________                                                              
                               Ex parte HIROSHI YAMAMOTO and SUGURU TAKISHIMA                                                       
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                                    Appeal No. 1999-2708                                                            
                                               Application No. 08/896,533                                                           
                                                          ____________                                                              
                                                            ON BRIEF1                                                               
                                                          ____________                                                              
               Before JERRY SMITH, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                                                       
               Judges.                                                                                                              
               BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                                  



                                                     DECISION ON APPEAL                                                             
                       The examiner rejected the appellants’ claims 1-4, 8-11,                                                      
               13-15, 18-20, and 22-25.  They appeal therefrom under 35                                                             
               U.S.C. § 134(a).  We reverse.                                                                                        


                                                          BACKGROUND                                                                



                       1The appellants waived an oral hearing scheduled for                                                         
               October 16, 2001.  (Paper No. 30.)                                                                                   





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007