Appeal No. 1999-2720
Application No. 08/580,965
Claims 1-4 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Tichy in view of Ambriola.
Claim 5 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Tichy in view of Ambriola and further in
view of Leblang.
Claim 6 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Tichy in view of Ambriola and further in
view of Allman.
Claims 8-9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being
unpatentable over Tichy in view of Ambriola and further in
view of Allman and SunSoft.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief1 and the Examiner's
Answer for the respective details thereof.
1The Brief was received October 26, 1998, and the
Examiner's Answer was mailed January 4, 1999. A Reply Brief
was received March 8, 1999. A response by the Examiner to
Appellant's Reply Brief was mailed May 11, 1999, and stated
that the reply brief had been entered and considered but no
further response by the Examiner was necessary.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007