Appeal No. 1999-2720
Application No. 08/580,965
complete copies.
Appellant then contends that the Examiner is in error in
stating that the combination of Tichy and Ambriola would work
because RCS as disclosed by Tichy, and Cedar as disclosed by
Ambriola are different stages of development of an integrated
version/configuration management system. Appellant asserts
that RCS and Cedar are entirely two different technical
generations. As evidence thereof, he points to the Ambriola
statement10 "As we
will show, these generations corresponding to the use of
different basic methods and technologies for the support of
the activities of configuration management and version
control." (emphasis added).
Finally, Appellant argues11 that contrary to the
Examiner's conclusion, the "storeback command" does not
integrate file modifications, but for each modified file it
copies the complete file back to its original location. He
10Page 303, column 2
11Reply brief, page 8
11
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007