Ex parte GETSCHMANN - Page 1




            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                
            was    not written for publication and is not binding precedent           
            of the Board.                                                             
                                                                                     
              Paper                                                                   
                                        No.15                                         

                     UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                    ____________                                      
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                             Ex parte HORST GETSCHMANN                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No.1999-2819                                   
                             Application No.08/631,952                                
                                    _____________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                    _____________                                     
            Before URYNOWICZ, JERRY SMITH, and FLEMING,                               
            Administrative Patent Judges.                                             
                                                                                     
            URYNOWICZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                   


            Decision on Appeal                                                        
            This appeal is from the final rejection of claims 1-                      
            16, all the claims pending in the application.                            
            The invention pertains to a rotor assembly.  Claims                       
            1 and 14 are illustrative and read as follows:                            
                 1. A rotor assembly for a dynamoelectric machine                     
                     comprising:                                                      
                 a shaft including an outer circumferential                           
                 surface portion having a circular cross section                      
                 defining a shaft diameter; and                                       
                 a plurality of laminations, each lamination                          
                 having a central opening receiving said shaft, said                  
                 central opening defining an inner periphery                          
                 including a plurality of radially inwardly extending                 
                 compressible protrusions defining an inner diameter                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007