Ex parte GETSCHMANN - Page 2


            Appeal No. 1999-2819                                                      
            Application No. 08/631,952                                                
                 slightly smaller than said shaft diameter, said                      
                 protrusions being compressed onto said outer                         
                 circumferential surface portion of said shaft to                     
                 form a press fit between said lamination and said                    
                 shaft.                                                               
                 14.   A method of assembling a rotor assembly for a                  
                    dynamoelectric machine comprising the steps of:                   
                      forming a shaft including an outer                              
                 circumference portion having a circular cross                        
                 section defining a shaft diameter;                                   
                      forming a plurality of laminations, each                        
                 lamination having a central opening defining an                      
                 inner periphery, the inner periphery including a                     
                 plurality of radially inwardly extending                             
                 compressible protrusions defining a diameter                         
                 slightly smaller than said shaft diameter;                           
                      inserting said shaft into said central openings                 
                 of said laminations; and                                             
                      compressing said protrusions against said outer                 
                 circumferential surface portion of said shaft to                     
                 form a press fit between said laminations and said                   
                 shaft.                                                               
                                                                                     
            The references relied upon by the examiner as                             
            evidence of obviousness are:                                              
            Field II (Field)          4,423,343         Dec. 27, 1983                 
            Nilsson                   4,423,345         Dec. 27, 1983                 
            Iseman et al. (Iseman)    5,218,252         Jun. 08, 1993                 
            Neuenschwander            5,349,741         Sep. 27, 1994                 

            Bosch                     FR 2,247,004      May  02, 1975                 
            Claims 1, 2, 4, 6 and 7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C.                      
            § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Field in view of                      
            Bosch.                                                                    
            Claim 3 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                           
            being unpatentable over Field and Bosch, further in view                  
            of Iseman.                                                                
            Claims 5 and 8-15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. §                          

                                          2                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007