Ex Parte MURRAY et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-0121                                                        
          Application No. 08/773,665                                                  

          exemplary claim 56, a copy of which appears in the APPENDIX to              
          the main brief (Paper No. 17).                                              

               As evidence of obviousness, the examiner has applied the               
          documents listed below:                                                     

          Jacobi                   2,677,261                May   4, 1954             
          Osgood, Sr.              4,466,259                Aug. 21, 1984             
               The following rejections are before us for review.                     

               Claim 56 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being             
          anticipated by Jacobi (Figs. 4 and 5).                                      

               Claim 57 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Jacobi.                                                   

               Claim 58 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being             
          unpatentable over Jacobi in view of Osgood, Sr.                             











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007