Ex Parte MURRAY et al - Page 5



          Appeal No. 2000-0121                                                        
          Application No. 08/773,665                                                  

          longitudinally movable and semi-circular member 25 which                    
          complements the stem 23 and fills the round holes 21 and 22.                

               As to the anticipation rejection of independent claim 56, it           
          is quite clear to us that the now claimed "generally rectangular            
          slot" in the external wall of a portable electronic device is not           
          anticipated by round holes in the refrigerator of Jacobi.  Thus,            
          the rejection of claim 56 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) cannot be                
          sustained.                                                                  

               Turning now to the obviousness rejection of claim 57, which            
          claim sets forth particular dimensions of the generally                     
          rectangular slot,  this panel of the board discerns no suggestion3                                                          
          that would have been derived by one having ordinary skill in the            
          art from the Jacobi teaching for configuring the expressly                  
          disclosed round holes 21, 22 with a rectangular shape.                      
          Accordingly, this rejection of claim 57 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          cannot be sustained.                                                        











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007