Ex parte MANLOVE et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-0312                                                        
          Application No. 08/610,007                                                  


               Claims 1 through 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)            
          as being unpatentable over the admitted prior art circuit of                
          Figure 1 in view of Masuda.                                                 









                                        OPINION                                       
               We have carefully considered the entire record before us,              
          and we will reverse all of the rejections of record.                        
               Masuda discloses a circuit (Figure 3) that compensates for             
          an offset voltage that arises in an operational amplifier 22.  A            
          feedback circuit connected between the output and the input of              
          the operational amplifier 22 includes a comparator 28, a pulse              
          signal generating circuit 40, an AND gate 30, an U/D counter 44,            
          a D/A converter 50, and a voltage to current converter 52.  The             
          examiner acknowledges (answer, page 3) that Masuda “does not                
          disclose that the inverting input of the amplifier 22 receives              
          an input signal comprising an AC component and a DC component as            
          called for in claim 1.”  Notwithstanding this deficiency in the             
                                          3                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007