Ex Parte CHANDLER et al - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for                        
                                publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                                                                                     Paper No.  31                       
                                                                                                                        
                              UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                  
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                   BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                    
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                          Ex parte DANIEL A. CHANDLER,                                                   
                                             MARTIN MATTHIESEN and                                                       
                                                   DEREK LEONG                                                           
                                                   _____________                                                         
                                                Appeal No. 2000-0701                                                     
                                              Application No. 08/816,471                                                 
                                                   ______________                                                        
                                                      ON BRIEF                                                           
                                                  _______________                                                        
              Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO and DIXON,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
              HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                     

                                               DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1 through 6, 9, 10 and 12                      
              through 20.                                                                                                
                     The disclosed invention relates to an electrical device that comprises a                            
              conductive polymer element that exhibits positive temperature coefficient (PTC)                            


              behavior, and at least one metal foil electrode in direct physical contact with the                        

                                                           1                                                             





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007