Ex parte DAVIS et al. - Page 1




              The opinion in support of the decision being entered                 
                   today was not written for publication and is                    
                        not binding precedent of the Board                         
                                                     Paper No. 27                  
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                    
                                   _______________                                 
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                       
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                
                                   _______________                                 
                               Ex parte JOHN G. DAVIS,                             
                                  MICHAEL A. GAYNES                                
                                  and JOSEPH D. POOLE                              
                                   ______________                                  
                                  Appeal No. 2000-0713                             
                             Application 08/864,726                                
                                   _______________                                 
                             HEARD: February 19, 2002                              
                                   _______________                                 
         Before KIMLIN, WALTZ and POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judges.           
         POTEATE, Administrative Patent Judge.                                     
                                                                                  
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                               
              This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134               
         from the final rejection of claims 16-20, which are all of the            
         claims remaining in the application.                                      
              Claim 16 is representative of the subject matter on                  
         appeal and is reproduced below:                                           
              16.  An adhesive preform of thermoplastic material for               
         bonding facing surfaces of upper and lower components of an               
         electronic package, the adhesive preform comprising                       
              opposing convex curved surfaces, the perimeter of the                
         adhesive preform having concave shape edges.                              


                                        1                                          





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007