Ex parte DAVIS et al. - Page 3




         Appeal No. 2000-0713                                                      
         Application 08/864,726                                                    


              Various methods for providing an adhesive bond between a             
         heat sink and integrated circuit package are known in the art.            

         One such method involves positioning an adhesive preform                  
         between the heat sink and integrated circuit package and then             
         heating the assembly to create a bond.  Specification, page 4,            
         lines 1-7.  One of the drawbacks of this method is that air or            
         gas may be captured between bonding surfaces and the resultant            
         bubbles present a region of reduced thermal conductivity.                 
         Specification, page 3, lines 11-18 and page 4, lines 7-12.  It            
         is less likely that air or gas will be trapped if a                       
         dispensable adhesive, rather than an adhesive preform is                  
         utilized.  Specification, page 4, lines 13-20.  However,                  
         dispensable adhesives generally have either poor thermal                  
         characteristics or require special dispensing equipment and               
         handling.  Specification, page 4, line 20-page 5, line 4.                 
              The purpose of the present invention is to provide a                 
         thermoplastic preform adhesive which overcomes the                        
         aforementioned drawbacks of the prior art.  Appeal Brief, p.              
         2.  The claimed adhesive preform is shaped such that it has               
         opposing convex surfaces and a perimeter having concave edges.            
         Claim 16.  Thus, the adhesive preform has a pillow-like shape             
         in cross-section.  Specification, page 10, lines 24-29.                   
         According to appellants:                                                  
              [a]s a direct result of the configuration of the                     
              present invention, it is now possible to avoid                       
              entrapment of ambient gases or air between the facing                
              surfaces of the electronic package . . . [and] to                    
              significantly control and/or regulate the flow of                    
                                         3                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007