Ex parte CAO - Page 1




                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is         
                                             not binding precedent of the Board.                                           
                                                                                      Paper No. 23                         

                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                   
                                                    _____________                                                          
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                                AND INTERFERENCES                                                          
                                                    _____________                                                          
                                                 Ex parte YONG CAO                                                         
                                                    _____________                                                          
                                                 Appeal No. 2000-0747                                                      
                                                 Application 08/872,657                                                    
                                                    ______________                                                         
                                                       ON BRIEF                                                            
                                                   _______________                                                         

              Before HAIRSTON, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.                                           

              FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                        

                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                         

                     This is decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 10, 12,               
              14, 16 and 18 to 92, all the claims pending in the present application.  Claims 2, 4, 6, 8,                  
              11, 13, 15 and 17 have been cancelled.                                                                       
                     The invention relates to polymer LEDs which have a transparent hole-injecting                         
              anode layer, an emissive layer and an electron-injecting cathode layer wherein the                           











Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007