The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RICHARD A. KELLEY, DANNY M. NEAL, MICHAEL A. PEREZ,
PAUL G. ROBERTSON, PADMAVATHY TAMIRISA and JOHN D. UPTON
____________
Appeal No. 2000-1187
Application No. 08/723,174
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, JERRY SMITH, and SAADAT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 1, 5, 6, 10, 11 and 15 through 17.1
1 The rejection of claims 2 through 4, 7 through 9 and 12
through 14 was withdrawn in the answer.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007