Ex Parte HOLTON et al - Page 3


                 Appeal No.  2000-1294                                                        Page 3                  
                 Application No.  08/850,924                                                                          














                        The reference relied upon by the examiner is:                                                 
                 Holton                           5,254,703                  Oct. 19, 1993                          
                                             GROUND OF REJECTION                                                      
                        Claims 2-9, 11-15, 17, 18, 20-37 and 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                        
                 § 103 as being unpatentable over Holton.                                                             
                        We reverse.                                                                                   
                                                   DISCUSSION                                                         
                        To establish a prima facie case of obviousness, there must be more than                       
                 the demonstrated existence of all of the components of the claimed subject                           
                 matter.  There must be some reason, suggestion, or motivation found in the prior                     
                 art whereby a person of ordinary skill in the field of the invention would make the                  
                 substitutions required.  That knowledge cannot come from the applicants'                             
                 disclosure of the invention itself.  Diversitech Corp. v. Century Steps, Inc.,                       
                 850 F.2d 675, 678-79, 7 USPQ2d 1315, 1318 (Fed. Cir. 1988); In re Geiger,                            









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007