Ex parte BAKER et al. - Page 3




          Appeal No. 2000-1524                                                        
          Application No. 08/943,711                                                  


          the result from the speech recognition server and to                        
          communicate the result to the Java application.                             

               The examiner relies on the following reference:                        
          Sarukkai et al. [Sarukkai]     5,819,220        Oct. 6, 1998                
                         (filed Sep. 30, 1996)                                        



               Claims 1-20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) as                   
          anticipated by Sarukkai.                                                    
               Reference is made to the briefs and answer for the                     
          respective positions of appellants and the examiner.                        


                                       OPINION                                        


               Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) is established only                
          when a single prior art reference discloses, expressly or                   
          under the principles of inherency, each and every element of a              
          claimed invention as well as disclosing structure which is                  
          capable of performing the recited functional limitations.  RCA              
          Corp. V. Applied Digital Data Systems, Inc., 730 F.2d 1440,                 
          1444, 221 USPQ 385, 388 (Fed. Cir.); cert. dismissed, 468 U.S.              
          1228 (1984); W.L. Gore and Associates, Inc. V. Garlock, Inc.,               
                                         -3–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007