Ex parte BAKER et al. - Page 7




          Appeal No. 2000-1524                                                        
          Application No. 08/943,711                                                  


          Sarrukai could be said to disclose a Java application which                 
          generates what could be considered a “grammar,” there is no                 
          disclosure in Sarrukai that that “grammar” is then used by a                
          speech recognition server in conjunction with a speech input                
          to output a result which is then sent back to the Java                      
          application to perform an action based on that result.                      
















               Accordingly, the examiner’s decision rejecting claims 1-               
          20 under 35 U.S.C. 102(e) is reversed.                                      


                                      REVERSED                                        




                                         -7–                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007