Ex Parte ROMER et al - Page 1




                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered                                
                  today was not written for publication in a law journal                              
                  and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                          
                                                                           Paper No. 17               


                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                   
                                                                                                     
                              BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                      
                                        AND INTERFERENCES                                             
                                                                                                     
                                  Ex parte DR. MICHAEL ROMER,                                         
                           ANASTASIOS DIMITRIADIS and DIRK RAUDIES                                    
                                                                                                     
                                       Appeal No. 2000-1854                                           
                                   Application No. 08/993,426                                         
                                                                                                     
                                              ON BRIEF                                                
                                                                                                     

            Before KIMLIN, WARREN and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                            
            KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      


                                        DECISION ON APPEAL                                            
                  This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 19-32,                         
            all the claims remaining in the present application.  Claim 19 is                         
            illustrative:                                                                             
            19. A polymer composition containing                                                      
                  from 5.0% by weight to 65.0% by weight of at least one                              
            thermotropic liquid crystalline copolymer,                                                
                  from 35% by weight to 95.0% by weight of at least one                               
            thermoplastically processable polycarbonate and                                           

                                                 -1-                                                  




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007