Ex Parte ROMER et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2000-1854                                                                      
            Application No. 08/993,426                                                                


                  from 0.01% by weight to 5.0% by weight of at least one of                           
            reinforcing agents (a) or (b), said component reinforcing agent                           
            (a) being a polyetherimide, an aromatic acid, an aromatic acid                            
            anhydride, a siloxane, a silicone-modified compound, or a mixture                         
            thereof, said reinforcing agent (b) being a phosphorus-containing                         
            compound mixed with a said reinforcing agent (a).                                         
                  The examiner relies upon the following references as                                
            evidence of obviousness:                                                                  
            Kim                                   3,334,154               Aug.  1, 1967               
            Froix                                 4,460,735               Jul. 17, 1984               
            Aketa et al. (Aketa)                  5,514,739               May   7, 1996               
                  Appellants' claimed invention is directed to a polymer                              
            composition comprising a thermotropic liquid crystalline                                  
            copolymer, a thermoplastically processable polycarbonate, and at                          
            least one reinforcing agent selected from one of the specified                            
            groups (a) or (b).  The composition finds utility in forming                              
            thin-walled molded articles.                                                              
                  In accordance with the grouping of claims set forth at                              
            pages 6 and 7 of appellants' principal brief, claims 19, 24,                              
            25-28 and 29-31 (Group I) stand or fall together.                                         
                  Appealed claims 19-25 and 29-32 stand rejected under                                
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Aketa.  Claims 19-32                           
            stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over                           
            Aketa in view of Froix or Kim.                                                            
                  We have thoroughly reviewed each of appellants' arguments                           
            for patentability.  However, we are in complete agreement with                            

                                                 -2-                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007