Ex Parte CUOMO et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2000-2009                                                                              
            Application No. 08/832,430                                                                        

                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The invention is directed to a method and system for providing an interface                
            which allows a computer server to connect multiple users to a multi-user game.                    
            Representative claim 1 is reproduced below.                                                       
                   1.    A method of providing a network interface in a data processing system to             
                   connect multiple users for a multi-user game, comprising the steps of:                     
                         using a LobbySession object to encapsulate access to a Lobby Server;                 
                         using said LobbySession object to retrieve a list of available games                 
                   registered with the Lobby Server; and                                                      
                         using said LobbySession object to return a common GameSession object                 
                   in response to both a user requesting to register a game with the LobbySession,            
                   or requesting to join a registered game.                                                   
                   The examiner relies on the following reference:                                            
            Grimm et al. (Grimm)                   5,828,843                 Oct. 27, 1998                    
                                                                       (filed Mar. 20, 1997)                  
                   Claims 1-4, 8-13, 17-22, 26, and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as                
            being anticipated by Grimm.                                                                       
                   We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7) and the Examiner's Answer (Paper             
            No. 14) for a statement of the examiner's position and to the Brief (Paper No. 13) and            
            the Reply Brief (Paper No. 15) for appellants’ position with respect to the claims which          
            stand rejected.                                                                                   





                                                     -2-                                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007