Ex Parte CUOMO et al - Page 6

                  Appeal No. 2000-2009                                                                                                                    
                  Application No. 08/832,430                                                                                                              

                  interpretation.  We thus cannot sustain the rejection of claims 1-4, 8-13, 17-22, 26, and                                               
                  27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as being anticipated by Grimm.                                                                                 


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           The rejection of claims 1-4, 8-13, 17-22, 26, and 27 under 35 U.S.C. § 102  is                                                 
                  reversed.                                                                                                                               


                                                                    REVERSED                                                                              




                                             KENNETH W. HAIRSTON                                   )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             ERROL A. KRASS                                        )     APPEALS                                          
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )       AND                                            
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP                                 )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      






                                                                           -6-                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November  3, 2007