Ex Parte ADELERHOF et al - Page 1



             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not        
              written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board        
                                              Paper No. 21                             

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     _______________                                   
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     _______________                                   
                              Ex parte DERK J. ADELERHOF,                              
                                     RONALD DEKKER,                                    
                                          and                                          
                                   HENRICUS G.R. MAAS                                  
                                     ______________                                    
                                   Appeal No. 2000-2181                                
                              Application No. 08/966,229                               
                                     _______________                                   
                                        ON BRIEF                                       
                                     _______________                                   
          Before HAIRSTON, FLEMING, and LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.            
          HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       
                                                                                      
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims                    
          1 through 4 and 11 through 20.  Claim 5 is objected to as being              
          dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if              
          rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of            
          the base claim and any intervening claims.                                   
               The disclosed invention relates to a thin-film magnetic head            
          having a magnetic layer structure arranged on one of two parallel            
          sides of a semiconductor substrate, and an integrated circuit                




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007