Ex Parte ADELERHOF et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2000-2181                                                         
          Application No. 08/966,229                                                   

          formed on the other of the two parallel sides of the                         
          semiconductor substrate.                                                     
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it                
          reads as follows:                                                            
               1.  A thin-film magnetic head having a head face and a                  
               magnetic layer structure which is arranged on one of two                
               parallel sides of a semiconductor substrate, wherein the                
               semiconductor substrate is provided with an integrated                  
               circuit, characterized in that the semiconductor substrate              
               is secured to a carrier body by means of a securing layer               
               between the other of said two parallel sides and the carrier            
               body.                                                                   
               The references relied on by the examiner are:                           
          Daughenbaugh et al. (Daughenbaugh) 4,317,147       Feb. 23, 1982             
          Lazzari                       4,809,103            Feb. 28, 1989             
          Lin et al. (Lin)                    5,506,737      Apr.  9, 1996             
          Zieren et al. (Zieren)              5,513,057      Apr. 30, 1996             
          Sundaram                      5,710,683      Jan. 20, 1998                   
                                                  (filed Apr. 18, 1996)               
               Claims 1, 3, 4, 11 through 13, 17 and 18 stand rejected                 
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lin in view              
          of Sundaram.                                                                 
               Claims 2 and 20 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as              
          being unpatentable over Lin in view of Sundaram and Lazzari.                 
               Claims 11 and 14 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Lin in view of Daughenbaugh.                         
               Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as             
          being unpatentable over Lin in view of Daughenbaugh and Lazzari.             
                                          2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007