Ex Parte ABE et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0175                                                        
          Application No. 08/857,585                                                  

               a composition including (a) high-silica zeolite having a               
          Si/Al atomic ratio of not less than 40 and an alkali metal                  
          content of 0.1% by weight or less and (b) a heat-resistant oxide            
          other than zeolite, wherein said heat-resistant oxide is loaded             
          with a noble metal, and said composition is coated on the                   
          partition walls.                                                            
               The examiner relies upon the following references as                   
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Eberly, Jr. et al. (Eberly)       3,591,488         Jul.  6, 1971           
          Inoue et al. (Inoue)              5,223,236         Jun. 29, 1993           
          Kawabata et al. (Kawabata)        Hei 2-56247       Feb. 26, 1990           
          (Japanese Patent Specification)                                             
               Appellants' claimed invention is directed to an adsorbent              
          structure comprising a honeycomb which has a composition coated             
          on its partition walls.  The composition comprises a high-silica            
          zeolite having a Si/Al atomic ratio of not less than 40 and an              
          alkali metal content of 0.1% by weight or less, and a heat-                 
          resistant oxide, other than zeolite, that is loaded with a noble            
          metal.  According to appellants, "[t]he adsorbent structure of              
          the present structure is particularly effective in the treatment            
          of exhaust gases" (page 3 of principal brief, second paragraph).            
               Appealed claims 3, 5, 6, 12 and 14 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kawabata in view of              
          either Eberly or Inoue.                                                     
               Appellants submit at page 4 of the principal brief that                
          "[c]laims 3, 5, 6, 12, and 14 stand as a unit."  Accordingly, all           

                                         -2-                                          



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007