Ex Parte GAILUS et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0189                                                        
          Application No. 09/033,873                                                  
          pressure chambers affixed to the ceramic piezoelectric layer, the           
          ink pressure chambers being disposed at locations corresponding             
          to the electrode locations in the deformable electrode material             
          pattern.                                                                    
               Claim 1 is illustrative of the invention and reads as                  
          follows:                                                                    
                    1.  An ink jet printhead comprising a ceramic                     
               piezoelectric transducer layer, a pattern of deformable                
               electrode material adhesively bonded to a surface of the               
               ceramic piezoelectric layer and a chamber plate with a                 
               surface formed with ink pressure chambers affixed to the               
               ceramic piezoelectric layer with the ink pressure chambers             
               disposed at locations to corresponding to the locations of             
               electrodes in the pattern of deformable electrode material.            
               The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                        
          Pies et al. (Pies)            5,554,247           Sep. 10, 1996             
                                                  (filed Apr. 11, 1995)               
          Moynihan et. al. (Moynihan)   5,605,659           Feb. 25, 1997             
                                                  (filed Jun. 02, 1995)               
          Hine et al. (Hine)            5,771,052           Jun. 23, 1998             
                                                  (filed Nov. 04, 1996)               
               Claims 1-6 stand finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e)             
          as being anticipated by Moynihan.  Claims 1, 3, 5, and 6 stand              
          finally rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable             
          over Hine in view of Pies.                                                  
               Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellants and the              
          Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 9) and Answer           
          (Paper No. 10) for the respective details.                                  

                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007