Ex Parte GLUSENKAMP et al - Page 4


                Appeal No.  2001-0756                                                   Page 4                
                Application No.  08/666,400                                                                   
                1265, 23 USPQ2d at 1783.  “The factual inquiry whether to combine references                  
                must be thorough and searching.”  In re Lee, 277 F.3d 1338, 1343, 61 USPQ2d                   
                1430, 1433  (Fed. Cir. 2002), quoting McGinley v. Franklin Sports, Inc., 262 F.3d             
                1339, 1351-52, 60 USPQ2d 1001, 1008 (Fed. Cir. 2001).                                         
                      Moreover, it is improper for this board, and for that matter the examiner, to           
                hold claims upatentable for obviousness based solely on conclusory statements                 
                about what is “common knowledge” or “well known” in the art, without objective                
                evidence in support of that knowledge.  See Lee, 277 F.3d at 1344, 61 USPQ2d                  
                at 1434-1435.  On this record, there is no evidence directing a person of ordinary            
                skill in the art to the use of methanol instead of ethanol as is required in step A of        
                the claimed invention.                                                                        
                      Since the examiner failed to establish a factual basis in the evidence to               
                support his conclusion that the teaching of ethanol/triethylamine renders obvious             
                the use of methanol/triethyl-amine for the reaction of squaric acid with amines we            
                are compelled to reverse the rejection of record.                                             





















Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007