Ex Parte DUFFIELD et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-0962                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 07/687,276                                                  

          p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the               
          appendix to the appellants’ brief.                                          

                                   The prior art                                      
               The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                   
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                               
          Sanchez-Frank et al. (Sanchez-Frank)    5,394,522   Feb. 28, 1995           
                                             filing date (Dec. 10, 1990)              
                                   The rejections                                     
               Claims 1 to 3, 6 to 11 and 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.           
          § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sanchez-Frank.1                            
               Rather than reiterate the conflicting viewpoints advanced              
          by the examiner and the appellants regarding the above-noted                
          rejections, we make reference to the answer (Paper No. 23) for              
          the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejections,             
          and to the brief (Paper No. 22) for the appellants’ arguments               
          thereagainst.                                                               




               1  The examiner’s rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second              
          paragraph has been resolved by an amendment after final (see                
          answer at page 2).                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007