Ex Parte DUFFIELD et al - Page 6



          Appeal No. 2001-0962                                       Page 6           
          Application No. 07/687,276                                                  

               The examiner states:                                                   
                    . . . such was taught in col. 5 (lines 50-                        
                    52).  Thus when the workstation was connected                     
                    to the network, communication was established                     
                    (initiated) and the configuration file was                        
                    transmitted and stored at the workstation. It                     
                    clearly was anticipated that an initiation of                     
                    communication between the workstation and the                     
                    host computer (administrator’s workstation)                       
                    had to first be performed prior to trans-                         
                    mission of any type of data. [answer at page 9]                   
               While it is true that Sanchez-Frank discloses that there is            
          some automatic direct distribution of configuration files, there            
          is no disclosure that the examiner has directed our attention to            
          which states that the distribution is automatic upon initiation             
          of communication with the host computer or that such distribution           
          is made between a newly established workstation and the host                
          computer.  As such, we will not sustain the rejection as it is              
          directed to claims 2 and 10.                                                
               To summarize:                                                          
               The examiner’s rejection of claims 1 to 3, 6 to 11 and 13              
          is sustained.                                                               
               The examiner’s rejection of claims 2 and 10 is not                     
          sustained.                                                                  









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007