Ex Parte CANADA et al - Page 2




               Appeal No. 2001-1062                                                                                                 
               Application No. 08/910,297                                                                                           


                       Claim 1 is illustrative of the claimed invention, and it reads as follows:                                   
                       1.  A receiver for use with a first antenna which receives first polarized signals and a second              
               antenna which receives second polarized signals, the first polarized signals having a substantially                  
               different polarization than the second polarized signals, said first polarized signals and said second               
               polarized signals being depolarized components of an original transmitted signal, the receiver                       
               comprising:                                                                                                          
                       a phase detector connected to the first antenna to receive the first polarized signal and to the             
               second antenna to receive the second polarized signal;                                                               
                       a phase shifter for adjusting the phase of the first polarized signal to produce a phase                     
               compensated first signal; and                                                                                        
                       a combiner circuit connected to the second antenna to receive the second polarized signal                    
               and to the phase shifter to receive the phase compensated first signal, the combiner circuit                         
               constructively summing the second polarized signal and the phase compensated first signal to                         
               generate a combined polarization received signal.                                                                    
                       The references relied on by the examiner are:                                                                
               Lo et al. (Lo)                                 4,313,220                      Jan. 26, 1982                          
               Bottomley et al. (Bottomley)                   5,392,054                      Feb. 21, 1995                          
               Iwasaki                                        5,513,222                      Apr. 30, 1996                          
               Hwang                                          5,923,714                      Jul.  13, 1999                         
                                                                                     (filed Mar. 27, 1997)                          
                       Claims 1 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lo in                  
               view of Iwasaki and appellants’ admitted prior art.                                                                  
                       Claims 6 through 8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lo in                  
               view of Iwasaki, appellants’ admitted prior art and Hwang.                                                           
                       Claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Lo in view of                    
               Iwasaki, appellants’ admitted prior art and Bottomley.                                                               

                                                                 2                                                                  





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007