Appeal No. 2001-2229
Application No. 09/346,226
obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having
ordinary skill in the art.
Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) rejection of claims 1 and 8, and dependent claims 6
and 16, as being unpatentable over Dixon in view of Ashmore,
Rosenblatt and Watanabe.
SUMMARY
The decision of the examiner to reject claims 1, 6, 8 and
16 is reversed.
REVERSED
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007