Ex Parte JIANG et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2001-2315                                                          
          Application 09/145,106                                                        

               Independent claim 27 is reproduced as follows:                           
               27.  A packaged integrated circuit device, comprising:                   
               a die carrier;                                                           
               an integrated circuit die mounted onto a surface of the die              
          carrier; and                                                                  
               a passivation layer comprising plasma polymerized                        
          methylsiloxane extending over portions of the die and the die                 
          carrier.                                                                      
                                      REFERENCES                                        
               The references relied on by the Examiner are as follow1:                 
          Verzaro et al. (Verzaro)       5,569,497            Oct. 29, 1996             
          Yew et al. (Yew)               5,956,233            Sep. 21, 1999             
                                                  (filed Dec. 19, 1997)                
          Biederman et al., “Plasma Polymerization Processes: Plasma                    
          Technology, volume 3, 1992, pages 183-203.                                    
                                  REJECTION AT ISSUE                                    
               Claims 27 through 40 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as             
          being unpatentable over Yew in view of Biederman and Verzaro.                 




               1 We note that the Examiner has cited additional references              
          in the Examiner’s answer on pages 3 and 4.  However, these                    
          additional references have not been applied in the 35 U.S.C.                  
          § 103 rejection.  Therefore these references are not properly                 
          before us for our consideration for the rejection of the claims               
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                        
                                           2                                            




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007