Ex Parte PROVITOLA - Page 11




                  Appeal No. 2002-0030                                                                                      Page 11                       
                  Application No. 09/314,267                                                                                                              


                                                                  CONCLUSION                                                                              
                           To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 7 under 35 U.S.C.                                                   
                  § 112, second paragraph, is reversed;  and the decision of the examiner to reject claims                                                
                  1, 2, 5, 8, 11, 12, 17 and 20 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) and the decision of the examiner                                                 
                  to reject claims 7, 9 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is being held in abeyance pending                                                    
                  the outcome of the above-noted remand.                                                                                                  


                           This application, by virtue of its "special" status, requires immediate action, see                                            
                  MPEP § 708.01.                                                                                                                          
                                                           REVERSED; REMANDED                                                                             





                                             CHARLES E. FRANKFORT                                  )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   ) BOARD OF PATENT                                      
                                             JEFFREY V. NASE                                       )     APPEALS                                          
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )       AND                                            
                                                                                                   )  INTERFERENCES                                       
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                                                                                   )                                                      
                                             JENNIFER D. BAHR                                      )                                                      
                                             Administrative Patent Judge                           )                                                      







Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007