Ex Parte BORTFELD et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 2002-0882                                                        
          Application 09/161,146                                                      

          including an input shaft, an output shaft, and an acknowledgment            
          device for emitting an acknowledgment signal to a driver that re-           
          engagement of the clutch may be properly effected, the                      
          synchronization equipment including at least one sliding bushing            
          movable along the input shaft by operation of actuating elements,           
          the improvement comprising:                                                 
               distance sensors installed on at least one of said at least            
          one sliding bushing or the actuating elements of said at least              
          one sliding bushing for the recognition of a beginning of a                 
          synchronization process by evaluation of a movement covered by              
          said at least one sliding bushing along the input shaft, thereby            
          permitting the acknowledgment signal to be emitted at a point in            
          time advance of completion of the synchronization process.                  
                                   THE PRIOR ART                                      
               The prior art items relied on by the examiner to support the           
          appealed rejections are:                                                    
          Holdeman                         4,440,042       Apr.  3, 1984              
          Morscheck et al. (Morscheck)     4,676,115       Jun. 30, 1987              
          Asahara et al. (Asahara)         5,195,035       Mar. 16, 1993              
          Kojima et al. (Kojima)           5,612,880       Mar. 18, 1997              
          Showalter et al. (Showalter)     5,771,477       Jun. 23, 1998              
          The prior art discussed on pages 1 and 2 of the appellants’                 
          specification (the admitted prior art).                                     
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               Claims 1, 2, 10 through 12 and 14 through 16 stand rejected            
          under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Showalter in            
          view of Morscheck and the admitted prior art.                               
               Claims 3 through 5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)             
          as being unpatentable over Showalter in view of Morscheck, the              
          admitted prior art and Kojima.                                              

                                          3                                           



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007