Ex Parte YEO et al - Page 1
Legal Research Home >
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences > 2002 > Ex Parte YEO et al - Page 1
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte DAREN YEO, PATRICK RAIOLA and KENNETH O. WOOD
____________
Appeal No. 2002-1788
Application No. 09/217,667
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before STAAB, McQUADE, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges.
NASE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 to 7, 9
to 24 and 40 to 46. Claim 8 has been objected to as depending from a non-allowed
claim. Claims 25 to 39 have been withdrawn from consideration. No claim has been
canceled.
We AFFIRM-IN-PART.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Last modified: November 3, 2007
|