Appeal No. 1999-0166
Application No. 08/656,544
Accordingly, since we are of the opinion that the prior
art applied by the Examiner does not support the obviousness
rejection, we do not sustain the rejection of independent
claim
1 and 9, nor of claims 3-8 dependent thereon. Therefore, the
decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 1 and 3-9 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
LANCE LEONARD BARRY ) APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
STUART S. LEVY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
JFR:hh
12
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007