Appeal No. 1999-0808 Page 5
Application No. 08/645,397
The Examiner made the rejection under § 102(b). We make no judgement with respect to
obviousness. We simply find that the Examiner has failed to demonstrate that Figlarz describes, either
expressly or inherently, each and every step of the claimed process.
We conclude that the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of anticipation with
respect to the subject matter of claims 1-26.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the Examiner to reject claims 1-26 under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) is reversed.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007