Appeal No. 1999-0937
Application No. 08/646,530
Accordingly, we have before us only claims 1 through 10 and 14
under rejection.
Appellant’s invention pertains to a wheelchair for
transporting a rider and cargo, and to a wheel chair for
transporting a handicapped person in a seated position. A basic
understanding of the invention can be derived from a reading of
exemplary claims 1 and 14, respective copies of which are
attached to the brief (Paper No. 13).
As evidence of anticipation and obviousness, the examiner
has applied the documents listed below:
Drew 3,328,046 Jun. 27, 1967
Cockram 4,171,139 Oct. 16, 1979
Morford 4,565,385 Jan. 21, 1986
The following rejections are before us for review.
Claims 1 and 7 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as
being anticipated by Cockram.
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007