Appeal No. 1999-0937
Application No. 08/646,530
teaching, and was not applied by the examiner for that purpose.3
Since the evidence does not support a conclusion of obviousness,
the rejection of claim 14 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 cannot be
sustained.
As expressed above, we have not sustained the rejections of
independent claims 1 and 14. It follows that we do not sustain
the respective rejections of the claims dependent therefrom.
In summary, this panel of the board has not sustained any of
the rejections on appeal.
3 The same can be said for the Morford patent, also relied
upon by the examiner.
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007