Ex parte FINN et al. - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was                                                                                   
                   not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the                                                                                  
                   Board.                                                                                                                                           

                                                                                                                   Paper No. 21                                     

                                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                                                 
                                                                        __________                                                                                  
                                                 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                                                 
                                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                                                  
                                                                        __________                                                                                  
                                                        Ex parte PATRICK J. FINN,                                                                                   
                                                            ANTHONY J. FORMICOLA,                                                                                   
                                                               JOSEPH R. BLASZAK,                                                                                   
                                                               ROBERT M. FERGUSON                                                                                   
                                                                              and                                                                                   
                                                                 LAURENCE J. LYND                                                                                   
                                                                        __________                                                                                  
                                                              Appeal No. 1999-1002                                                                                  
                                                        Application No. 08/672,493                                                                                  
                                                                        __________                                                                                  
                                                                          ON BRIEF                                                                                  
                                                                        __________                                                                                  
                   Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent                                                                                 
                   Judges.                                                                                                                                          
                   PER CURIAM.                                                                                                                                      

                                                                DECISION ON APPEAL                                                                                  
                            This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection                                                                                
                   of claims 17-26, 28-36 and 38-46,  which are all the claims    1                                                                                 

                            1 We  note  the  following  informality  is  deserving of                                                                               
                   correction for claim 21, "the fuser roll" lacks antecedent basis                                                                                 
                                                                                 1                                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007