The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 29
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ALFRED E. BENTON
and
CHESTER D. BEINTEMA
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1267
Application No. 08/755,150
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection
of claims 1-9, 11-15, 17, 18 and 20-25 which are all of the
claims remaining in the application.1
1By an apparently inadvertent oversight, the claim
amendment filed October 21, 1996 has not been clerically
processed. This oversight should be rectified upon return of
the application file to the jurisdiction of the Examining
Corps.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007