Ex Parte CADET - Page 2




                Appeal No. 1999-1286                                                                                                      
                Application No. 08/567,950                                                                                                


                        A.      Findings of fact                                                                                          
                        The record supports the following findings by at least a preponderance of the                                     
                evidence.2                                                                                                                
                                                            The invention                                                                 
                        Appellant’s invention relates to methods of testing integrated circuits on a wafer                                
                and destructively marking any defective circuits by laser-irradiating each circuit to be                                  
                destroyed at a plurality of locations.  (Specification at 4;  claim 1.)  According to                                     
                Appellant, the claimed methods avoid the problems inherent in marking circuits with ink,                                  
                such as large ink-spot size, non-uniform marking and the need for subsequent re-                                          
                marking, misidentification and non-destruction of bad circuits, smudges and inadvertent                                   
                making and destruction of good circuits, inadvertent marking and contamination of the                                     
                supporting platform.  (Id. at 2–3.)  In particular, Appellant states that by simultaneously                               
                marking and destroying each circuit in a plurality of locations, the circuit is rendered                                  
                useless more effectively than destruction at a single location.  (Id. at 4, fifth paragraph.)                             
                According to Appellant, the multiple loci of destruction also inhibit fraudulent use of                                   
                defective circuits.  (Id.)                                                                                                






                        2  To the extent these findings of fact discuss legal issues, they may be treated as conclusions of law.          
                                                                  - 2 -                                                                   





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007