Ex Parte KOZLOWSKI et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                   for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.         
                                                                 Paper No. 23         
                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                   Ex parte GREGORY KOZLOWSKI and CHARLES E. OBERLY                   
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1999-2595                                 
                              Application No. 08/927,106                              
                                     ____________                                     
                                       ON BRIEF                                       
                                     ____________                                     
          Before OWENS, WALTZ, and KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges.               
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s refusal to         
          allow claims 1, 3 through 6, 19, 21 and 22 as amended subsequent to         
          the final rejection (see the amendment dated Aug. 3, 1998, Paper            
          No. 17, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Aug. 6, 1998,              
          Paper No. 18).  Claims 1, 3-6, 19, 21 and 22 are the only claims            
          pending in this application.  We have jurisdiction pursuant to              
          35 U.S.C. § 134.                                                            
               According to appellants, the invention is directed to a                
          neodymium gallate (NGO) surface layer on a nickel sheath which acts         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007