Ex Parte KOZLOWSKI et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-2595                                                        
          Application No. 08/927,106                                                  

          as a diffusion barrier to prevent diffusion of nickel into the              
          yttrium-based copper oxide (YBCO) superconductor during subsequent          
          high temperature melt-processing (Brief, page 2).  A copy of                
          illustrative independent claim 1 is attached as an Appendix to this         
          decision.                                                                   
               The examiner has relied upon the following references as               
          evidence of obviousness:                                                    
          Woolf et al. (Woolf ‘389)     5,047,389          Sep. 10, 1991              
          Woolf et al. (Woolf ‘360)     5,164,360          Nov. 17, 1992              
          Ozaki et al. (Ozaki), “Preparation of Superconducting Y-Ba-Cu-O             
          Thin Films on Metallic Substrates,” Proc. of the Conference on the          
          Science and Technology of Thin Film Superconductors, pp. 363-370            
          (1989).                                                                     
          Boikov et al. (Boikov), “Epitaxial growth and properties of                 
          YBa2Cu3O7-*/NdGaO3/YBa2Cu3O7-* trilayer structures,” Appl. Phys. Lett.,     
          59(20), pp. 2606-2608 (1991).                                               
          Han et al. (Han), “Metalorganic chemical vapor deposition route to          
          epitaxial neodymium gallate thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett., 61(25),         
          pp. 3047-3049 (1992).                                                       
               Claims 1, 19, 21 and 22 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.                 
          § 103(a) as unpatentable over Ozaki in view of Woolf ‘389 and               
          Boikov, further in view of Han (Answer, page 3).1  Claims 3-6 stand         
          rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over the                  

               1The examiner has incorrectly stated the Boikov reference as           
          “Boivok et al.” on page 3 of the Answer, but correctly listed               
          this reference on page 4 of the Answer.  Accordingly, this error            
          is deemed harmless.                                                         
                                          2                                           




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007