The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WAYNE ISAMI IMAINO, ANTHONY JULIANA,
MILTON RUSSELL LATTA, CHARLES H. LEE,
WAI CHEUNG LEUNG, HAL J. ROSEN,
STEVEN MEEKS, and RICHARD SONNENFELD
____________
Appeal No. 2001-0864
Application No. 08/841,214
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1-8, 10-
18 and 20. Claims 9 and 19 have been indicated by the examiner to be allowable if
rewritten in independent form.
We REVERSE.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007