Ex Parte IMAINO et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2001-0864                                                                                     
              Application No. 08/841,214                                                                               


                                                   BACKGROUND                                                          
                    Appellants’ invention relates to a surface inspection tool.  An understanding of                   
              the invention can be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced                    
              below.                                                                                                   
                    1.     An apparatus for inspecting a planar surface of a disk for use in a                         
                    disk drive comprising:                                                                             
                           means for scanning a laser beam (the incident beam) over at least                           
                    a portion of a first planar surface of the disk to generate a reflected beam;                      
                           a detector for converting an intensity of the reflected beam from the                       
                    planar surface into an analog signal;                                                              
                           means for sampling and digitizing the analog signal to generate                             
                    pixel data stored in a buffer;                                                                     
                           means for calculating a rate of change in the intensity of the                              
                    reflected beam from the pixel data; and                                                            
                           means for applying a selected threshold to the rate of change in the                        
                    intensity of the reflected beam to identify defects or features.                                   

                    The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                    
              appealed claims are:                                                                                     
              Cuthbert et al. (Cuthbert)                      3,790,287            Feb.  5, 1974                       
              Boehnlein et al. (Boehnlein)                    5,307,152            Apr. 26, 1994                       
              Bou-Ghannam et al. (Bou-Ghannam)                5,710,631            Jan. 20, 1998                       
                                                                             (filed Jan. 27, 1997)                     
              Womack et al. (Womack)                          5,818,592            Oct.   6, 1998                      
                                                                            (filed Feb. 7, 1997)                      



                                                          2                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007