Ex Parte DESAI et al - Page 2


                Appeal No.  2001-1154                                                   Page 2                
                Application No.  08/482,579                                                                   
                             (b)   from about 0.2 to about 14% by weight of an iodide                         
                                   component selected from the group consisting of iodide salt,               
                                   iodide acid and mixtures thereof; and                                      
                             (c)   from about 2% to about 85% by weight of an alkyl                           
                                   polyglycoside having the formula I;                                        
                                                R1O(R2O)b(Z)a      I                                          
                      wherein R1 is a monovalent organic radical having from about 6 to about                 
                      30 carbon atoms; R2 is a divalent alkylene radical having from 2 to 4                   
                      carbon atoms; Z is a saccharide residue having 5 or 6 carbon atoms; b is                
                      a number having a value from 0 to about 12; a is a number having a value                
                      from 1 to about 6, all weights being based on the weight of the                         
                      concentrate.                                                                            
                      The references relied upon by the examiner are:                                         
                Sheety                         4,576,818                 Mar. 18, 1986                       
                McCurry, Jr., et al. (McCurry)  5,266,690                Nov. 30, 1993                       
                Lennette et al. (Lennette), Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 4th Edition, American            
                Society for Microbiology, p. 132 (1985)                                                       
                                         GROUNDS OF REJECTION                                                 
                      Claim 22 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph, as                    
                lacking antecedent basis for the phrase “said aqueous antimicrobial use                       
                composition.”2                                                                                
                      Claims 1, 3-11, 13-18 and 20-25 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as                 
                being unpatentable over appellants’ acknowledged prior art in view of Lennette,               
                Shetty and McCurry.                                                                           
                      We affirm the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 112, second paragraph and                     
                reverse the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 103.                                                  


                                                                                                              
                2 We note that the rejection of claims 4, 14 and 21 was withdrawn (see Paper No. 17) in response
                to appellents’ amendments.  See Reply Brief, Appendix of Claims.                              





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007