Ex Parte MUNOZ-GARCIA et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2001-1185                                                        
          Application No. 08/915,597                                 Page 2           

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to a satellite communications            
          gateway management system.  An understanding of the invention can           
          be derived from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is                    
          reproduced as follows:                                                      
               1.  A communication system wherein a user terminal can                 
          communicate with a plurality of satellites;                                 
               wherein each of said plurality of satellites can communicate           
          with a plurality of earth stations;                                         
               wherein each of said plurality of earth stations is operable           
          to provide a gateway into a terrestrial communication system; and           
               wherein said user terminal is registered at a selected one             
          of said plurality of earth stations as its gateway station;                 
          wherein said gateway station, in the event of being unable to               
          establish contact with said user terminal, is operative to select           
          and instruct another earth station to establish contact with said           
          user terminal to act as an alternative earth station and being              
          further operative to pass messages to and from said user terminal           
          through said alternative earth station while acting as said                 
          gateway into said terrestrial communication system.                         
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Hatano et al. (Hatano)   5,355,511           Oct. 11, 1994                  
          Azer                     5,481,592           Jan.  2, 1996                  
          Sowles et al. (Sowles)   5,561,836           Oct.  1, 1996                  

               Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11, and 13 stand rejected under 35           
          U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Sowles in view of                
          Hatano.                                                                     








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007